DraftCraft

#DraftCraftUSA

DraftCraft

#DraftCraftUSA

DraftCraft

#DraftCraftUSA

DraftCraft

#DraftCraftUSA

India's Legal Powers And America's First Amendment Challenge

India's power to revoke Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) privileges is colliding with America's First Amendment freedoms, exposing a legal fault line between sovereign authority and individual liberty. While New Delhi insists that foreign nationals cannot meddle in its domestic politics under the cover of diaspora privileges, Washington's growing crackdown on transnational repression raises uncomfortable questions about where immigration enforcement ends and political retaliation begins. At stake is a high-voltage clash between national security, constitutional freedoms and the rights of millions of overseas Indians, maintains Gajanan Khergamker.

The legal and administrative framework surrounding Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) status reflects a delicate balance between state sovereignty, national security, diaspora engagement, and international law. For millions of naturalized foreign citizens of Indian origin, the OCI card provides an important statutory connection to their birthland - granting multi-entry, lifelong visa privileges to visit family, manage inherited property, maintain cultural links, and conduct business. However, under both Indian constitutional law and international norms, the grant of entry or residency privileges to foreign nationals remains an exercise of sovereign discretion rather than an absolute right. This distinction places the regulatory rights of a sovereign state alongside the statutory expectations of overseas diaspora members who hold citizenship elsewhere.

The Double Squeeze On Indian American Citizens

A 109 per cent surge in anti-South Asian slurs online, the growing scrutiny of immigration enforcement, and a contentious caste-discrimination debate expose three fault lines in the civil rights protections available to a community of 5.41 million. Add the threat of losing access to ancestral India through OCI cancellation, and the question of belonging becomes considerably more complicated, says Manu Shrivastava.

The American dream carries a contradiction for millions of Indian Americans. They have become citizens, entrepreneurs, technology professionals, academics, doctors, elected representatives and employers across the United States, yet their belonging can still be challenged by racial hostility from outside their community and inherited social hierarchies within it. Their passports may establish their American citizenship, but online abuse can still cast them as foreigners. Meanwhile, for those who retain family, property and professional connections to India, the Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card can become an additional point of vulnerability when political expression collides with the discretionary powers of a foreign government.

Opponents Say Stay Legal, Display Art In Private

Generally, Street Art is quickly dismissed as ‘vandalism’ and an illegal activity when ‘not in private galleries’ or ‘sponsored by non-profits’. Those opposing Street Art keep insisting artists must resort only to “legal” methods of art in the privacy of their homes, while conveniently ignoring the glaring fact that the high-end art world is discriminatory, much to a selective convenience. 

Keep America Beautiful (KAB), a large non-profit with corporate sponsors like H&M, PepsiCo, and McDonalds, began a program in 2007 called Graffiti Hurts. They even offer grants upwards of USD 2,000 to local governments and police departments for fighting Street Art. Their slogan? “We keep America beautiful so Americans can do beautiful things.” Now, the non-profit is conveniently silent on which Americans are given the right to create those “beautiful things?” And, at whose expense?

US Supreme Court Overrules Women's Right Over Their Own Bodies

That US Supreme Court's overruling of the Roe v/s Wade was a dismal imminent was given but worse is the shockingly casual treatment of the event by the world's media and political leaders. 

The nation's inability to transform the 1973 ruling into a legislation was bad enough, but even worse is the effect the overruling has had on the state of women rights in the United States, almost five decades later. 

The nation hasn't flinched while exercising a self-professed moral right to police the rest of the world even formulate state-funded studies to evaluate the extent and reach of women rights across the globe, even as its own lot is affected directly and drastically.

Street Art Must Be Bold, Inspiring Or Make Waves

Street Art has origins from a time we are yet to fathom and, in time, discover. Limited as we are by man-made language, nomenclature, and terminology besides the means so simplistic and apparent like paper and other media, like say walls, Art, and in particular, Street Art, is an extension of that what can be generated on traditional medium but extends to public spaces.

On the European front, skewedly propagated as a world platform, it was in the French Revolution’s iconoclasm era, when rebels defaced high-end art to protest French society’s toxic hierarchy creating a niche called graffiti that became synonymous with vandalism. It was the waves of political and economic turbulence that triggered the rise of street art around the world: The Berlin Wall’s ‘one-sided’ graffiti being projected as a fight of colourful expression on one side versus the stark totalitarianism of bland emptiness on the other being a rather simplistic definition.

The Bias of Commercial Surrogacy Must Be Smashed

Perception, almost always, has a symbiotic relation with perspective. One shapes the other and only in a manner that one can. A person, whose perception is honed, over time and with experience, is perceived as one possessing an exhaustive perspective on the issue. That the perspective is subjective doesn’t matter in the least to a homogenous audience, with views similarly coloured, which conveniently considers it entirely objective. 

The perspective derived from a sea of ‘local’ indigenous experience lies shrouded and, concurrently, unaffected by any external, ‘foreign’ perspective on the ‘local’ issue. This, in a liberal extension of interpretation, can be loosely applied to hard-nosed nationalism usually associated with love for one’s nation and almost always to the exception of every other.

Providing The Healing Balm, Soothing The Hurt

Probably the most peaceful yet powerful influence of Street Art can be gauged by Japanese garden designer Itaru Sasaki who initiated the Wind Phone project in 2010 to help cope with his cousin’s death. After Itaru lost his cousin to terminal cancer, he set up an old telephone booth in his garden in December 2010, to continue to feel connected to him by “talking” to him on the phone. The wind phone was not designed with any specific religious connotation but as a way to reflect on his loss.

However, in the 2011 earthquake and tsunami that killed over 15,000 people in the Tohoku region, including over 1,200 people in Ōtsuchi (about 10 percent of the town’s population), he threw access to the structure open to the public. The wind phone since, received more than 30,000 visitors.